M&F hates to get all conspiracy theory. In fact, we hate that term because the word 'conspiracy' makes it sound like a bunch of aluminum cap wearing fanatics criticizing the government. But when the available evidence is more compelling than the official public record, then good citizens should and must question what is happening, and make our own conclusions based on the best evidence available. Searching for fact is not conspiracy, and in the case of the Boston Marathon Bombing, the biggest conspiracy seems to be the the way that the mainstream press has swallowed the questionable official explanation hook, line and sinker. The amount of evidence stacked up clearly implies that the Boston Bombing not an example of random terrorism, rather a coordinated false flag attack by the US Government on its own people.
A 'false flag attack' describes covert military of paramilitary operations designed to decieve in such a way that the operations appear as if they are being carried out by other entities than actually planned them. Here are some of the red flags that have been raised around the false flag Boston attack.
Before getting started, it is not conspiracy to look at the available facts. It is conspiracy if someone forms a hard opinion--no matter what that opinion is--without looking at the facts. So, before folks get crazy, just check out the ideas raised, and make your own conclusions about what makes more sense.
First of all, as the official FBI picture clearly demonstrates, the backback detonated in the bombing is different from the backbacks either of the two suspects are shown to be wearing. The logo
does match, however, the bag a paramilitary looking dude at the site was holding at the time. That is pretty basic stuff, and pretty elementary. The difference should be clear to everyone. Look at the pictures above and below for yourself.
And the questionable issues just continue. The 'hero' who reportedly had both legs blown off in the blast is identified as Jeff Bauman, but Jeff looks exactly like Nick Vogt, a former US Army Officer who had lost both legs previously in war. Check out the pics below, because it sure does look like the same dude. Futhermore, 'Donna' who was one of the witnesses to the bomb, is actually Dawn Hochsprung who months before was reported as being the principal at Sandy Hook and died there. Seriously. Check out the pic below, but you can't make this shit up. The craziest thing is that the mainstream media will broadcast the misinformation, but doesn't question it.
Furthermore, there are some
websites set up showing a rather convincing
frame-by-frame accounting of the immediate blast scene. It does look like there is some coordinated behavior, and why is there no blood where limbs are missing?
If only it stopped there. But also notice how both suspect brothers were taken into custody in relatively good health--both walked on their own towards the government enforcement entities. However, once the brothers are seen again, the body of the first one is completely ripped apart (wtf!?), and the younger one had a 'suicide' shot through the back of his neck--which, even if it didn't kill him also makes it so the guy can't talk. At first the government reported the second brother shot himself. A few days later they admitted no weapon was found with the second suspect. No explanation for a bullet hole through the back of the dude's throat has been given.
Not to get all conspiracy, but it seems like the conspiracy is what the government says happened.
As far as media goes, it makes one wonder if this is another final nail in the coffin for mainstream media. Mainstream media is scared to tell any story away from the official talking points, which forces people to look elsewhere for truth, or at least a story line that isn't complete bullshit. Even though the Boston Bombings have nothing to do with traditional street art, because the main news sources are failing to provide the full story, as an alternative news source, M&F felt this was something important that needed to be shared.
It is extremely frightening what happened in Boston. People are outraged, as they should be. But shouldn't we make sure our outrage is aimed at the right place? Don't these strange and suspicious circumstances require that we take a closer look at the Boston Bombings and try to find out what really happened?
